Washington Supreme Court· 3/19/1992
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson
Citations
- 826 P.2d 186
- 118 Wash. 2d 693
- 1992 Wash. LEXIS 74
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imposing a 60-day suspension where an attorney engaged in business transactions with clients without making adequate written disclosures
- imposing a 60-day suspension where an attorney engaged in business transactions with clients without making adequate written disclosures
- declining to impose the recommended six month suspension because it would have \drastic effect\ upon attorney's ability to continue repaying his clients
- declining to impose the recommended six month suspension because it would have “drastic effect” upon attorney’s ability to continue repaying his clients
- imposing suspension for failure to adequately disclose conflict when lawyer borrowed money from client
- imposing suspension for failure to adequately disclose conflict when lawyer borrowed money from client
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 61×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1980-11-06· cited 13×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1968-06-20· cited 9×
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1972-07-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.