Washington Supreme Court· 3/19/1992

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson

Citations

826 P.2d 186
118 Wash. 2d 693
1992 Wash. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

imposing a 60-day suspension where an attorney engaged in business transactions with clients without making adequate written disclosures
imposing a 60-day suspension where an attorney engaged in business transactions with clients without making adequate written disclosures
declining to impose the recommended six month suspension because it would have \drastic effect\ upon attorney's ability to continue repaying his clients
declining to impose the recommended six month suspension because it would have “drastic effect” upon attorney’s ability to continue repaying his clients
imposing suspension for failure to adequately disclose conflict when lawyer borrowed money from client
imposing suspension for failure to adequately disclose conflict when lawyer borrowed money from client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.