Skip to main content
· 8/13/1998

Matter of Dann

Citations

  • 960 P.2d 416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board generally may not substitute its own evaluation of the credibility of witnesses over that of the hearing officer
  • holding that the Board generally may not substitute its own evaluation of the credibility of witnesses over that of the hearing officer
  • rejecting justifications for initial-switching on billing invoices even when same resulted in lower fees
  • RPC 8.4(c) was violated by attorney trying to blackmail client during fee dispute with false affidavit
  • \an appeal of the Disciplinary Board's decision carries with it the chance that we might increase the recommended sanction ...\
  • RPC 8.4(c) was violated by attorney trying to blackmail client during fee dispute with false affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.