Skip to main content
· 6/16/2011

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van Camp

Citations

  • 257 P.3d 599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney could not justify contention that he charged a “flat fee” where his “fee agreement contain[ed] both [an] „earned retainer‟ phrase and listed hourly rates, which suggest[ed] that hourly rates may be charged against the „earned retainer‟ -13- amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C. Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.