Skip to main content
· 3/6/1905

City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 197 U.S. 178
  • 25 S. Ct. 420
  • 49 L. Ed. 713
  • 1905 U.S. LEXIS 1203

Syllabus

<p>An arrangement of parties which is merely a contrivance between friends to found jurisdiction on diverse citizenship in the Circuit Court will hot avail, and when it is obvious that a party who is really on complainant’s side has been made a defendant for jurisdictional reasons, and for the purpose of reopening in the United States courts a controversy already decided in the state courts, the court will look beyond the pleadings, and arrange the parties according to their actual sides in the dispute.</p> <p>The wrongful repudiation of, and refusal to pay, a contract debt by a city may amount merely to a naked breach of contract, and in the absence of any legislative authority affecting the contract or on which the refusal to pay is based, the mere fact that the city is a municipal corporation does not give to its refusal the character .of a law impairing the obligation of contracts or depriving a citizen of property without duo process of law, and give rise to a suit under the Constitution of the United States within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court.</p>

Judges: Holmes, Brewer, McKenna, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.