Skip to main content
· 9/10/2003

Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County

Citations

  • 343 F.3d 1036
  • 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1412
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8235
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10303
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18678
  • 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11
  • 2003 WL 22087572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a plaintiff may not sue an arm of the state in federal court for either injunctive or monetary relief
  • stating that in Rule 12(b)(1) facial challenges to subject matter 4 jurisdiction courts must confine the inquiry to allegations in the complaint
  • explaining that a facial challenge under Rule 12(b)(1) “confin[es] the inquiry to allegations in the complaint”
  • noting that “the party opposing the motion must furnish affidavits or other evidence . . . to satisfy its burden”
  • stating that “the denial of a motion to dismiss is ordinarily not a complete and final judg- ment subject to appeal . . .”
  • noting that 25 the non-moving party on a factual motion to dismiss must furnish affidavits or 26 other evidence to establish subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Thomas, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.