Skip to main content
· 1/6/2009

In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative Litigation

Citations

  • 615 F. Supp. 2d 1018
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 295
  • 2009 WL 35235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that to allege self-dealing “a plaintiff must plead that the defendants either (1) stood on both sides of a transaction and dictated its terms in a self-dealing way or (2) received a personal benefit that was not enjoyed by the shareholders generally”
  • same, where final judgment had not yet been entered in the related case that formed the basis for the contribution claim
  • same, where final judgment had not yet been entered in the related case that formed the basis for the contribution claim
  • “Sections 1709 and 1710 of the California Civil Code are codifications of common- 3 law fraud and negligent misrepresentation.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles R. Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.