· 1/6/2009
In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative Litigation
Citations
- 615 F. Supp. 2d 1018
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 295
- 2009 WL 35235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that to allege self-dealing “a plaintiff must plead that the defendants either (1) stood on both sides of a transaction and dictated its terms in a self-dealing way or (2) received a personal benefit that was not enjoyed by the shareholders generally”
- same, where final judgment had not yet been entered in the related case that formed the basis for the contribution claim
- same, where final judgment had not yet been entered in the related case that formed the basis for the contribution claim
- “Sections 1709 and 1710 of the California Civil Code are codifications of common- 3 law fraud and negligent misrepresentation.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles R. Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.