Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/20/2021
In re: D.A.H.
Syllabus
juvenile delinquency Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination at the schoolhouse Miranda warnings required when juveniles subjected to custodial interrogation at school trial court erred in denying juvenile's motion to suppress statements made during custodial interrogation at school where no Miranda warnings were given
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 563×
- State v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 51×
- In the Interest of R.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-21· cited 28×
- In Re KDLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2010-10-19· cited 17×
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-09-29· cited 17×
- N.C. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 14×
- B.A. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2018-06-20· cited 11×
- In Re LiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2010-07-06· cited 6×
- E. Town Mkt., L.P. v. 550 Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-21· cited 4×
- In Re RpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2011-11-01· cited 2×
- In re R.B.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.