Skip to main content

Citations

  • 700 S.E.2d 766
  • 207 N.C. App. 453
  • 2010 N.C. App. LEXIS 1954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Miranda “does not automatically apply to all government actors”—rather, it only applies to interrogations conducted by, or in concert with, law enforcement officers
  • noting that Miranda “does not automatically apply to all government actors”—rather, it only applies to interrogations conducted by, or in concert with, law enforcement officers
  • reversing the denial of a motion to suppress and remanding for further proceedings because of the possibility that the State could have elected to proceed without the confession
  • juvenile was subject to custodial interrogation when he was not “given the option of answering questions,” but rather was instructed to answer
  • “[W]e cannot forget that police interrogation is inherently coercive— particularly for young people.” (citations omitted)
  • juvenile was subject to custodial interrogation when he was not “given the option of answering questions,” but rather was instructed to answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunter, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.