Kritsidimas v. Sheskin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the \law of the case\ does not control \where the first ruling is clearly erroneous in light of newly-presented facts\
• stating that suppression motions ―demand detailed judicial consideration of specific facts‖ and ―often require hearings and findings of fact,‖ which are ―the kinds of judicial exercises the ‗law of the case‘ doctrine is designed to prevent being repeated‖
• describing rulings which require “hearings and findings of fact [as] exactly the kinds of judicial exercises the ‘law of the case’ doctrine [covers]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-14· cited 118×
• Weinberg v. Johnson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-12-08· cited 93×
• Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'n
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-12· cited 63×
• In Re Baby Boy C.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 56×
• Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 54×
• In Re Cleaver-Bascombe
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 43×
• Williams v. Mount Jezreel Baptist Church
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-18· cited 42×
• Indiana Insurance Co. v. Sentry Insurance Co.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-07-29· cited 35×
• Tompkins v. Washington Hospital Center
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-07-22· cited 26×
• Kauffman v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-06-12· cited 26×
• Minick v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-03-25· cited 25×
• Jones v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 25×
• Jung v. George Washington University
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-05-26· cited 21×
• Collins v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-04-08· cited 18×
• Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-07-26· cited 14×
• Kaplan v. Pointer
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-18· cited 13×
• Lenkin Co. Management v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-23· cited 13×
• P. P. P. Productions, Inc. v. W & L, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-07-30· cited 12×
• Johnson v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-01-21· cited 10×
• Lamont A. Biles v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 7×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrow v. Dillard
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-09-29· cited 189×
• Pitts v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-11· cited 89×
• Jenkins v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-16· cited 76×
• Stepanov v. Gavrilovich
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-03-30· cited 48×
• Wilburn v. Wilburn
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-07-22· cited 42×
• John A. Naples v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1966-04-11· cited 26×
• United States v. Davis
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-01-30· cited 18×
• Centennial Insurance Company v. Dowd's Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-06-21· cited 14×
• Sunshine Publishing Company v. Summerfield
  District of Columbia· 1960-05-20· cited 9×
• Washington v. Government of District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-06-23· cited 8×
• Cashio v. Cashio
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1978-10-09· cited 6×
• Elmira Corporation v. Bulman
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1957-10-23· cited 5×