In Re Gil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether an attorney-client relationship is a predicate for a Rule 1.15 violation is an open question
• “In construing the phrase ‘criminal act’ for purposes of Rule 8.4 (b), this court properly may look to the law of any jurisdiction that could have prosecuted respondent for the misconduct.” (emphasis added)
• applying the criminal law of where the underlying conduct occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).