District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/8/2011
In Re Allen
Citations
- 27 A.3d 1178
- 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 528
- 2011 WL 3925047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the fact that respondent’s conduct “did not involve moral turpitude does not diminish the severity of respondent’s misconduct”
- declining to find moral turpitude because “[i]n the end, this case turns on the allocation of the burden of proof’
- taking into account the vulnerability of attorney's assault victim and her status a client
- taking into account the vulnerability of attorney’s assault victim and her status a client
- focusing on respondent's motive for his crime and concluding it was the aberrational result of the exceptional stressors in his personal and professional life, rather than a desire for personal gain
- “Bar Counsel must show by clear and convincing evidence that respondent’s conduct, viewed in context, involved moral turpitude on the facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburne-Rigsby, Thompson, Ruiz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re SzymkowiczDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17· cited 6×
- In Re Barry DowneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29· cited 2×
- In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 1×
- In re Brandi NaveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-11-29· cited 1×
- IN RE JOHN T. SZYMKOWICZ, JOHN P. SZYMKOWICZ, LESLIE SILVERMAN, ROBERT KINGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17
- In re John T. SzymkowiczDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-11-08
- Szymkowicz v. FrischDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-31
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-07-03· cited 136×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-21· cited 76×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In re T.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-21· cited 48×
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 43×
- Matter of KentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-10-20· cited 35×
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 27×
- In Re DortchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-21· cited 27×
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-07-13· cited 21×
- In Re KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 18×
- In Re SneedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-29· cited 15×
- In Re SoininenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-10-25· cited 14×
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-01-09· cited 9×
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 9×
- Pitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-09-23· cited 8×
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 7×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.