District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/20/2011
In Re White
Citations
- 11 A.3d 1226
- 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 18
- 2011 WL 166079
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding disbarment appropriate where respondent made false accusations, fabricated evidence, and falsely recounted events to the Council for the District of Columbia
- “Where this court has concluded that the attorney’s conduct falls into a category of dishonesty of a flagrant kind it has held disbarment to be the appropriate sanction.”
- App'x A (attached Report and Recommendation of Board)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kramer, Oberly, Belson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-03-03· cited 49×
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-05· cited 27×
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-24· cited 23×
- In re AhaghotuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-09-12· cited 11×
- In re Laurence F. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 10×
- In re OmwengaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 10×
- In re PyeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-12-27· cited 10×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Angelique LAYTON, 36480Supreme Court of Colorado· 2021-05-14· cited 8×
- In Re ShariatiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 5×
- KEVIN YOUNG v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-28· cited 4×
- In re Sandy v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-17· cited 2×
- In re John T. SzymkowiczDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-11-08
- In re Larry KlaymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-06-11
- White v. District of Columbia Board on Professional ResponsibilitySupreme Court· 2011-05-31
- In re LibertelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-06-08
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-07-27
- Alston v. D.C. Dep't of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-05-02
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-31· cited 161×
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-12-04· cited 140×
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-31· cited 140×
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 107×
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-23· cited 94×
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-10-21· cited 92×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-21· cited 84×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-12· cited 58×
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 58×
- Hsu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-29· cited 56×
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-09· cited 51×
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-01-25· cited 49×
- Tucker v. LowerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-11-27· cited 48×
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 43×
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-13· cited 42×
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 41×
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-31· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.