Skip to main content
· 8/9/1988

In Re Calmar, Inc.

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 461
  • 7 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1713
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10834
  • 1988 WL 82156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • citing, among others, 1 After this petition was filed, the district court va- cated its previously-scheduled trial date. Case: 24-116 Document: 16 Page: 3 Filed: 03/18/2024 IN RE VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC 3 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988)
  • citing, among others, 1 After this petition was filed, the district court va- cated its previously-scheduled trial date. Case: 24-116 Document: 16 Page: 3 Filed: 03/18/2024 IN RE VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC 3 Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988)
  • “Hence it is clear that the purpose of the legislation, § ROBERT BOSCH, LLC v. PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP. 21 1292(c)(2), allowing interlocutory appeals in patent cases was to permit a stay of a damages trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Newman, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.