Supreme Court· 4/28/1947
McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
Citations
- 331 U.S. 96
- 67 S. Ct. 1165
- 91 L. Ed. 1365
- 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2996
- 73 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recounting that the district court ordered “[a]n accounting for profits and damages”
- recounting that the district court ordered “[a]n accounting for profits and damages”
- looking past the title placed on district court's document to determine its effect
- A good discussion of the policy of the statute per Justice Black
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 281×
- In Re Calmar, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-08-09· cited 196×
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.Federal Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 97×
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Federal Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 71×
- W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., in No. 75--1162 v. Carlisle Corporation, in No. 75--1163Third Circuit· 1976-01-23· cited 55×
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Rex L. BrunsingNinth Circuit· 1967-05-23· cited 20×
- Majorette Toys (u.s.) Inc., and Majorette S.A. France v. Darda, Inc. U.S.A., D/B/A Darda Toy Company, and Helmut DardaFederal Circuit· 1986-07-22· cited 16×
- Marsh-Mcbirney, Inc. v. Montedoro-Whitney CorporationFederal Circuit· 1989-09-25· cited 16×
- MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2003-08-06· cited 13×
- Ronel Corporation v. Anchor Lock of Florida, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1963-01-09· cited 12×
- Industrias Metálicas Marva, Inc. v. LausellD. Puerto Rico· 1997-04-01· cited 11×
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. Guardian Industries Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1987-05-29· cited 9×
- Russell Box Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.First Circuit· 1950-02-21· cited 6×
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationFourth Circuit· 1970-09-10· cited 4×
- Caddo Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1957-10-09· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseFederal Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 3×
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.D. Delaware· 1989-08-16· cited 3×
- SCHLEGEL MANUFACTURING CO. v. King Aluminum Corp.S.D. Ohio· 1974-09-04· cited 3×
- American Saint Gobain Corp. v. Armstrong Glass Co.E.D. Tennessee· 1969-06-10· cited 2×
- Sri International, Inc. v. Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-02-10· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-26· cited 2,668×
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 184×
- Bowman v. LoperenaSupreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 62×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1945-01-02· cited 18×
- Kammerer Corp. v. McCulloughS.D. California· 1941-06-07· cited 9×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1943-10-18· cited 7×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1945-03-14· cited 4×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1946-06-29· cited 2×
- Brick v. A. I. Namm & Sons, Inc.E.D. New York· 1927-07-21· cited 1×
Other cases named McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
9 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1945-01-02· cited 18×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1943-10-18· cited 7×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1945-03-14· cited 4×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1946-06-29· cited 2×
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1944-03-01
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-10-15
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1944-05-08
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1944-06-05
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-02-03
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.