Federal Circuit· 5/3/2006
In Re Echostar Communications Corporation
Citations
- 448 F.3d 1294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Echostar waived attorney client privilege over communications when it asserted the defense of reliance on advice of counsel
- explaining that work product that is never communicated to the client is not discoverable
- distinguishing between “factual” and “opinion” work product in analyzing advice-of-counsel defense to a charge of patent infringement
- finding waiver “for any document or opinion that embodies or discusses a communication to or from it concerning whether that patent is valid, enforceable, and infringed by the accused”
- \[W]ork-product immunity . . . promotes a fair and efficient adversarial system. . . .\
- “[W]ork product waiver is not a broad waiver of all work product related to the same subject matter like the attorney-client privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schall, Gajarsa, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCFederal Circuit· 2007-08-20· cited 147×
- United States Ex Rel. Drakeford v. TuomeyFourth Circuit· 2015-07-02· cited 101×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyN.D. Texas· 2006-10-16· cited 91×
- Center Partners, Ltd. v. Growth Head GP, LLCIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 52×
- In Re Princo CorporationFederal Circuit· 2007-03-01· cited 45×
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-08-28· cited 45×
- In Re MSTG, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-04-09· cited 41×
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-12-21· cited 37×
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-05· cited 36×
- Phoenix Solutions Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.N.D. California· 2008-10-22· cited 30×
- Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-03-29· cited 28×
- Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-07-21· cited 24×
- Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-03-29· cited 23×
- Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-07-31· cited 22×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneD. New Mexico· 2014-08-23· cited 22×
- Gingrich v. Sandia CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-15· cited 19×
- Terry v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-12-22· cited 19×
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-04-18· cited 18×
- The SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION v. KempthorneE.D. New York· 2009-09-09· cited 18×
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2006-07-18· cited 13×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 4,814×
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-11-17· cited 1,679×
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyD.C. Circuit· 1980-02-15· cited 1,241×
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 923×
- In Re Sealed CaseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 426×
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationSecond Circuit· 1998-02-13· cited 379×
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherFederal Circuit· 1983-09-23· cited 229×
- In Re Calmar, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-08-09· cited 196×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 2005-12-27· cited 163×
- In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardFourth Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 151×
- In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 150×
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationSecond Circuit· 1995-10-26· cited 124×
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyFederal Circuit· 2005-06-22· cited 123×
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaFederal Circuit· 1996-11-14· cited 119×
- Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh, Plaintiff-Cross v. Dana Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products Corporation, and Haldex Brake Products AbFederal Circuit· 2004-09-13· cited 115×
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonN.D. California· 1976-01-07· cited 115×
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2001-09-10· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.