In Re MSTG, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding documents pertinent to the issue of a reasonable royalty
• holding documents pertinent to the issue of a reasonable royalty
• rejecting a privilege for settlement negotiations because Congress, by enacting Rule 408, “did not take the additional step of protecting settlement negotiations from discovery.”
• finding no federal 21 privilege for settlement negotiations in matters arising under patent laws
• finding no federal privilege for settlement 17 negotiations in matters arising under patent laws
• finding settlement negotiations related to royalties and damage calculations were discoverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-04-07· cited 82×
• Jane Doe v. Roy Black
  Eleventh Circuit· 2014-04-18· cited 38×
• In Re: Queen's University at Kingston
  Federal Circuit· 2016-03-07· cited 34×
• Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.C. v. Cassity
  E.D. Missouri· 2014-11-19· cited 26×
• Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.
  D. Oregon· 2015-07-29· cited 17×
• Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2017-12-29· cited 11×
• Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2017-01-30· cited 9×
• In re City of Stockton
  E.D. California· 2012-07-13· cited 8×
• Medicines Co. v. Mylan Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-03-19· cited 8×
• In Re Posco
  Federal Circuit· 2015-07-22· cited 1×
• In re Lake Lotawana Community Improvement District
  W.D. Missouri· 2016-12-19· cited 1×
• Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd. v. Std. Oil Co.
  Ohio Court of Claims· 2019-05-17
• Science Applications International Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-10-27
• In re Shelbyzme LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2013-12-12

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hickman v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
• United States v. Nixon
  Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• Trammel v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
• Schlagenhauf v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
• Herbert v. Lando
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,085×
• Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 931×
• Jaffee v. Redmond
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 915×
• United States v. Bryan
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 689×
• University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 608×
• In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-02-26· cited 262×
• United States v. Gillock
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 253×
• Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.
  First Circuit· 1980-10-17· cited 197×
• In Re Calmar, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1988-08-09· cited 196×
• ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 158×
• In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 150×
• Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1983-10-06· cited 143×
• Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1984-06-28· cited 131×
• Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.
  First Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 125×
• In Re Echostar Communications Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2006-05-03· cited 124×

Other cases named In Re MSTG, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re MSTG, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-05-17