In Re TS Tech USA Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s refusal to considerably weigh this factor in favor of transfer was erroneous when the witnesses would need to travel approximately 900 more miles to attend trial in Texas than in Ohio
• holding that nationwide sales gave the citizens of plaintiff’s chosen forum “no more or less of a meaningful connection to this case than any other venue”
• noting that “[n]one of the companies have an office in the Eastern District of Texas; no identified witnesses reside in the Eastern District of Texas; and no evidence is located within the venue”
• noting that mandamus may be granted to direct transfer when 4 IN RE: HP INC. the denial was a clear abuse of discretion such that refus- ing transfer produced a patently erroneous result
• applying the regional circuit’s procedural law because the petition did not involve substantive issues of patent law
• applying the regional circuit’s procedural law because the petition did not involve substantive issues of patent law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).