In Re Innotron Diagnostics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that lower court cited cases which reflect “the now-standard practice of separating for trial patent issues and those raised in an antitrust counterclaim”
• “‘[T]he prohibition is not against having two juries review the same evidence, but rather against having two juries decide the same essential issues.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).