Skip to main content

In Re Benjamin

Citations

  • 698 A.2d 434
  • 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 176
  • 1997 WL 426641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that differences in standard of proof does not automatically establish an infirmity of proof
  • concluding that New York’s “fair preponderance” standard of proof in disciplinary cases provides no basis in itself to avoid reciprocal discipline in this jurisdiction which uses the higher “clear and convincing evidence” standard
  • explaining that a public censure “is within the range of sanctions that might be imposed in a non-reciprocal case” for misrepresentations to a court
  • despite conflicting testimony regarding veracity of attorney’s allegedly false statement, the statement was “nonetheless misleading” and therefore would suffice as a basis for reciprocal discipline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Farrell, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Benjamin

28 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.