In Re Karr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a failure of an attorney to provide a copy of a brief to a client violated Rule 1.4(a)
• holding that a failure of an attorney to provide a copy of a brief to a client violated Rule 1.4(a)
• finding Rule 1.4(a) violation where lawyer failed to provide client with copy of brief before it was filed
• remanding to the Board for reconsideration of proposed sanction in light of court’s conclusion that respondent violated five Rules, not the seven the Board found were violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).