District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/31/1985
In Re Reback
Citations
- 487 A.2d 235
- 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to inform client of a material fact for two years sufficient to constitute deceit and misrepresentation
- “We need not decide whether this argument is correct, because the Board majority‟s alternative ground for finding a violation . . . is adequate to support the Board‟s ruling.”
- neglect means ―indifference and a consistent failure to carry out the obligations which the lawyer has assumed to [her] client or a conscious disregard for the responsibility owed to the client‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Belson, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-31· cited 161×
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 40×
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-31· cited 40×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-02· cited 35×
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-21· cited 29×
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-31· cited 28×
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-08-05· cited 26×
- In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-06· cited 25×
- In Re LenoirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-17· cited 23×
- In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 23×
- Matter of RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-07· cited 21×
- In Re MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-18· cited 20×
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-01-04· cited 19×
- In re Andrew J. KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-04-09· cited 16×
- In Re ArnejaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-01-31· cited 15×
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-24· cited 14×
- In Re WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-11-13· cited 14×
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 14×
- In re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-04· cited 13×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-10-17· cited 114×
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-13· cited 84×
- Matter of KeilerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-10-17· cited 40×
- District of Columbia Bar v. KleindienstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-08-11· cited 35×
- Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-07-19· cited 30×
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-08-01· cited 29×
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-03-31· cited 27×
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-09-07· cited 24×
- Matter of SheehyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-07· cited 24×
- Andolsun v. Berlitz Schools of Languages of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-01-24· cited 18×
- In Re CopeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-24· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.