District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/19/2015
In re Thomas Fortune Fay
Citations
- 111 A.3d 1025
- 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 98
- 2015 WL 1432162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that while they are ―quasi-criminal,‖ ―disciplinary proceedings are not criminal proceedings‖
- \[W]e consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether an attorney-client relationship exists.\
- “[W]e consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether an attorney-client relationship exists.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, McLeese, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patrick F. Andrews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-02-22· cited 10×
- In re Seth Adam RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 8×
- In re GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-21· cited 6×
- In re FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 3×
- Johnson v. District of Columbia, Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-07-13· cited 2×
- IN RE H. FRANKLIN GREENDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-21
- IN RE ERNEST P. FRANCIS, ESQUIREDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28
- Robert Johnson v. DC Dept. of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-07-13
- In re Dorrance Dickens & In re Deborah LuxenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-12-07
- Patrick F. Andrews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-03-15
- In Re Frederick Schwartz, JrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-12-19
- In re Michael M. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-04-23
- Butler v. AugustineDistrict of Columbia· 2020-05-06
- In re O'NeillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-06-16
- In re KlaymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-09-15
- In re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-10-13
- In re ClarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-03-15
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 358×
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 107×
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-29· cited 58×
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 41×
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-07-14· cited 39×
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-03-08· cited 37×
- Matter of BurtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-01-11· cited 32×
- In Re MorrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-28· cited 29×
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-31· cited 28×
- In Re DayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-09-10· cited 26×
- In Re DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 23×
- In Re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-28· cited 22×
- Brookens v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of LawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-03-04· cited 18×
- In Re ThydenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-06-16· cited 13×
- In Re Confidential (J.E.S.)District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-29· cited 12×
- In Re EdelsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-23· cited 6×
- The Florida Bar v. SteinSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.