District of Columbia· 9/25/2001
Ford v. Tait
Citations
- 163 F. Supp. 2d 57
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16133
- 2001 WL 1168185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing § 1983 damages claim under Younger because claim arose under federal question jurisdiction and plaintiff primarily sought equitable relief
- “[T]he D.C. Court of Appeals has authority over the D.C. Bar.”
- “[T]he D.C. Court of Appeals has authority over the D.C. Bar[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Slater v. BiehlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-03-21· cited 22×
- Stein v. Legal Advertising Committee of the Disciplinary BoardD. New Mexico· 2003-07-24· cited 8×
- Yelverton v. FoxDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-01· cited 3×
- Franco v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2006-03-22· cited 2×
- Jefferson-11th Street, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-05
- Eisenberg v. West Virginia Office of Disciplinary CounselDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-30
- Klayman v. PorterDistrict of Columbia· 2022-08-29
- Odutola v. FloydDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-23
- Klayman v. PorterDistrict of Columbia· 2023-03-14
- Klayman v. PorterDistrict of Columbia· 2025-10-16
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 7,192×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,061×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court· 1824-03-19· cited 1,899×
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 1,834×
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 1,716×
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 1,688×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,215×
- Dolcie Lawrence v. Peter Dunbar, United States of AmericaEleventh Circuit· 1990-12-27· cited 938×
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 628×
- William Hohri v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1986-02-12· cited 521×
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1996-01-19· cited 478×
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court· 1941-05-26· cited 458×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.