District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/9/2010
In Re Williams
Citations
- 3 A.3d 1179
- 2010 D.C. App. LEXIS 510
- 2010 WL 3501562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that imposition of a fitness requirement where the original- disciplining jurisdiction did not impose one “would constitute substantially different discipline pursuant to the exception to the imposition of identical reciprocal discipline in . . . § 11(c)(4)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Kramer, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-07-18· cited 12×
- In re WilliamsD. Connecticut· 2012-12-04· cited 4×
- In Re ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-12· cited 2×
- In re CarithersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 2×
- In re David M. KorreyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-01-25
- Williams v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court· 2012-01-09
- In re GonzalezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-07-25
- Com. v. O. RileyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-12-30
- In re AntonacciDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26
- In re JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-05-28
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-23· cited 94×
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-04-02· cited 50×
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-31· cited 28×
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 27×
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-08· cited 17×
- In Re ThorupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-02-23· cited 14×
- In Re MorrisseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-10-03· cited 11×
- In Re GallagherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-27· cited 11×
- In Re BielecDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 9×
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-09-21· cited 9×
- In Re DittonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 8×
- In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 7×
- In Re EdelsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.