In re B.D.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 361

Syllabus

Because counsel for the appellant-minor conceded that the interview was non-custodial, we did not find minor's confession was a violation of Miranda or that it was otherwise involuntary. Because counsel for the appellant-minor also failed to raise any argument about the element of second-degree burglary requiring a finding that a person was \present or likely to be present\ in the burglarized house, we did not address that issue and found that the appellant-minor's confession was otherwise sufficient evidence of guilt.