In Re Morrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of restitution is “material with respect to [disbarred attorney’s] recognition of the seriousness of [the attorney’s] misconduct, and as a 21 reflection of steps [the attorney] has taken to remedy [the attorney’s] wrongdoing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Cater
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-23· cited 94×
• In re Stanton
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-28· cited 3×
• In Re Hollis
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-26
• In re Johnson, Jr.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-08-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• M. A. P. v. Ryan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
• In Re Roundtree
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-31· cited 140×
• In Re Fair
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-13· cited 42×
• In Re Hager
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
• In Re Austin
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-02· cited 28×
• In Re Stanton
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-10· cited 6×
• In Re Roxborough
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-06-07· cited 5×
• In Re Kerr
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-04-25· cited 4×