District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/20/2007
In Re Romansky
Citations
- 938 A.2d 733
- 2007 WL 4438755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that is “virtually in equipoise” does not satisfy burden of proving charge by clear and convincing evidence
- evidence that is “virtually in equipoise” does not satisfy burden of proving charge by clear and convincing evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickman, Kramer, Belson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 18×
- In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-10-18· cited 18×
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-22· cited 11×
- In re Sandy v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-17· cited 2×
- Tarpeh v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-03-21· cited 1×
- Quinteros v. DyncorpDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-02
- In re KrameDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-11-03
- In re Dobbie & In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07
- Ricciardi v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-05-07
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-06· cited 255×
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-31· cited 161×
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-12-04· cited 140×
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-10-17· cited 114×
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-01-24· cited 49×
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-13· cited 42×
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-02· cited 28×
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-03· cited 27×
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 27×
- In Re Hadzi-AntichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-09· cited 24×
- In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 23×
- In Re RomanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-05· cited 19×
- In Re StarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-07-31· cited 15×
- In Re ZeigerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-04-24· cited 12×
- In Re PhillipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-01-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.