Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 2/22/1985

In re Amatex Corp.

Citations

  • 755 F.2d 1034
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 2434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order denying representation to class of future claimants in bankruptcy proceeding is equivalent to denial of request to intervene, and order denying right to intervene is appealable final order
  • holding that \Section 1109(b) continues the pattern of permitting interested parties in bankruptcy cases the absolute right to be heard and to insure their fair representation.\
  • holding that potential claimants — individuals exposed to asbestos but not manifesting symptoms— had a practical stake in the reorganization of asbestos manufacturer entitling them to party in interest standing and a voice in the reorganization proceedings
  • holding that order denying representation to class of future claimants in bankruptcy proceeding is equivalent to denial of request to intervene, and order denying right to intervene is appealable final order
  • explaining that future claimants “clearly have a practical stake in the outcome of the [bankruptcy] proceedings”
  • explaining that future claimants “clearly have a practical stake in the outcome of the [bankruptcy] proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

219 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re Amatex Corp.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.