Skip to main content
· 6/27/1991

Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)

Citations

  • 129 B.R. 710
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9128
  • 1991 WL 116967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The Plan undertook to resolve a complex reorganization in a novel and creative fashion. Such efforts should be encouraged....\
  • “The Plan undertook to resolve a complex reorganization in a novel and creative fashion. Such efforts should be encouraged____”
  • “The capacity of asbestos fibers to cause serious injuries is no longer disputed.”
  • “absent plaintiffs are not affirmatively required to act in any way in order to protect their rights and will not have to pay money damages if an adverse judgment is entered against the class”
  • discussing the ramifications of class treatment of mass torts
  • discussing advantages and disadvantages of class actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein, Lifland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.