Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 5/4/2011

In Re Global Industrial Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 645 F.3d 201
  • 87 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 691
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109
  • 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 178
  • 2011 WL 1662792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the list of potential parties in Section 1109 is not exclusive
  • explaining that the person aggrieved standard is “more stringent” than “party-in-interest” standing in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding
  • observing that “Article III standing and standing under the Bankruptcy Code are effectively coextensive”
  • observing that “Article III standing and standing under the Bankruptcy Code are effectively coextensive”
  • noting that parties involved in bankruptcy proceedings can lack standing to appeal
  • “Persuasive authority indicates that Article III standing and standing under the Bankruptcy Code are effectively coextensive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Jordan, Nygaard, McKee, Scirica, Ambro, Smith, Fisher, Chagares, Vanaskie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Global Industrial Technologies, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.