Kelley v. Nodine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Congress apparently assumed Section 1291 would be available for bankruptcy appeals because that provision was at one time proposed to be the exclusive source of such jurisdiction
• “[T]the statute does not require a finding of definite liability of the [debtor] as a condition precedent to holding an action related to a bankruptcy proceeding.”
• “We also agree with Judge Graves that the statute does not require a finding of definite liability of the estate as a condition precedent to holding an action related to a bankruptcy proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).