Wright v. Owens Corning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unknown creditors “were not afforded due process. Accordingly their claims were not discharged by the Plan and Confirmation Order, and they retained their cause of action against Owens Corning.”
• explaining that Frenville must continue to define when certain claims can be discharged, for the due process reasons discussed above
• “[s]ummary judgment is appropriate when ‘the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact...’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).