Supreme Court of Florida· 4/15/1999
Woods v. State
Citations
- 733 So. 2d 980
- 1999 WL 215347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that erroneous admission of victim's hearsay statements was harmless
- stating that a new trial is not required unless the newly discovered evidence would probably produce an acquittal on retrial
- noting that out-of-court statements by the declarant, who was victim in the case, could not be used to prove the state of mind or motive of the defendant
- holding \coldness\ prong of CCP is when killing was the product of cool and calm reflection and not an act prompted by emotional frenzy, panic, or fit of rage
- observing that “a homicide victim’s state of mind prior to the fatal event generally is neither at issue nor probative of any material issue raised in the murder prosecution”
- reversing sentence of death in light of one valid aggravator where there was substantial mitigation evidence including borderline IQ and lack of prior criminal behavior
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- F.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 200×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-10-16· cited 164×
- Commonwealth v. StallworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-04· cited 157×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-15· cited 151×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-01· cited 143×
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-26· cited 113×
- Conde v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-04· cited 112×
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-09-03· cited 100×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-05· cited 99×
- Lugo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-20· cited 95×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 93×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-03· cited 87×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-26· cited 79×
- Hutchinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-01· cited 78×
- Aguirre-Jarquin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-03-26· cited 76×
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-19· cited 76×
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 66×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-26· cited 745×
- State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 320×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-03-17· cited 305×
- Urbin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-07· cited 249×
- Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-04· cited 247×
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-14· cited 188×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 175×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-01· cited 175×
- Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-12-03· cited 173×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-11-16· cited 171×
- Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 149×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-09-22· cited 140×
- In re LucasSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 112×
- Gudinas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-10· cited 111×
- Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-19· cited 109×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-04· cited 108×
- Correll v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-14· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.