Skip to main content

Woods v. State

Citations

  • 733 So. 2d 980
  • 1999 WL 215347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that erroneous admission of victim's hearsay statements was harmless
  • stating that a new trial is not required unless the newly discovered evidence would probably produce an acquittal on retrial
  • noting that out-of-court statements by the declarant, who was victim in the case, could not be used to prove the state of mind or motive of the defendant
  • holding \coldness\ prong of CCP is when killing was the product of cool and calm reflection and not an act prompted by emotional frenzy, panic, or fit of rage
  • observing that “a homicide victim’s state of mind prior to the fatal event generally is neither at issue nor probative of any material issue raised in the murder prosecution”
  • reversing sentence of death in light of one valid aggravator where there was substantial mitigation evidence including borderline IQ and lack of prior criminal behavior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.