Skip to main content

Humphrey v. Riley

Citations

  • 291 Ga. 534
  • 731 S.E.2d 740
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2753
  • 2012 WL 3889097
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming portions of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel argument abandoned when several claims were “not supported by specific citation or argument” in violation of Ga. Supreme Court Rule 22
  • deeming portions ofineffective-assistanceof-counsel argument abandoned when several claims were “not supported by specific citation or argument” in violation of Supreme Court Rule 22
  • deeming portions of ineffective-assistance-of-counsel argument abandoned when several claims were “not supported by specific citation or argument” in violation of Supreme Court Rule 22
  • remanding for consideration of a claim 72 that the habeas court “explicitly declined to also address”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Humphrey v. Riley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.