Skip to main content

Hammond v. State

Citations

  • 710 S.E.2d 124
  • 289 Ga. 142
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1342
  • 2011 Ga. LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was sufficient evidence of asportation when victim was moved from room to room inside home
  • holding that the accused is entitled to a jury instruction according to the Garza rule on asportation
  • finding that the movement of the victim constituted asportation when the first two factors were not satisfied but the third and fourth were
  • finding that the movement of the victim constituted asportation when the first two factors were not satisfied but the third and fourth were
  • moving victim upstairs and between bathrooms was sufficient to show asportation as the movement enhanced the perpetrator’s control over the victim
  • holding that Garza applies retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.