Hall v. Terrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that certain claims “lack[ed] sufficient argument and citation to allow them to be meaningfully addressed”
• holding under Supreme Court Rule 22 that claims raised on appeal without “sufficient argument and citation to allow them to be meaningfully addressed” should be deemed abandoned
• addressing claims “lacking] sufficient argument and citation to allow them to be meaningfully addressed”
• decision not to present testimony is a matter of trial strategy
• “There can be more than one reasonable strategy for a defense.”
• “There can be more than one reasonable strategy for a defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).