Skip to main content

Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 735 So. 2d 238
  • 1999 WL 174457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “a line-up of inanimate objects is not subject to the same constitutional restrictions which burden eyewitness identifications of criminal defendants.”
  • concluding that “a line-up of inanimate objects is not subject to the same constitutional restrictions which burden eyewitness identifications of criminal defendants.”
  • noting that the trial judge, as a fact finder, is always in the best position to evaluate the credibility of the strikes
  • noting that the trial judge, as a fact finder, is always in the best position to evaluate the credibility of the strikes
  • finding evidentiary error harmless based on “overwhelming evidence from other sources that Hughes committed the rape and murder”
  • affirming sentence of death based on purely circumstantial evidence where defendant beat, raped, stabbed and strangled 16-year-old victim then set victim's chest on fire after she was dead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

190 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

269 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.