Skip to main content

Jordan v. State

Citations

  • 786 So. 2d 987
  • 2001 WL 423329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a defendant’s claim that the verdict was not responsive to jury instructions was procedurally barred because the defendant failed to contemporaneously object when the verdict was returned
  • \We have held that Mississippi's jury eligibility statute with regard to age and literacy is constitutional\
  • “[Defendant] did not make this argument at trial and is procedurally 4 barred from raising it for the first time on appeal.”
  • Issues concerning the form of the verdict are procedurally barred if no objection was made when the verdict was returned.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

226 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.