HTC CORP. v. IPCom GmbH & Co., KG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]laim language and the specification generally carry greater weight than the prosecution history”
• finding that “further comprising” signals something “additional”
• processor and transceiver Case: 20-1589 Document: 61 Page: 16 Filed: 07/27/2021 16 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED v. INTEL CORPORATION amounted to “nothing more than a general-purpose com- puter”
• “[T]he drafter likely would have followed the recitation of the mobile station in paragraph 7 with ‘further comprising’ instead of ‘comprising’ to signal that additional modification would be attached to the mobile station.”
• “Modi- fiers should be placed next to the words they modify.”
• the claim element “[a] mobile station for use with a network . . . that achieves a handover... by: □□□ storing link data . . .” does not require that the network take the action of storing link data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).