Skip to main content
· 4/9/2012

Noah Systems, Inc. v. Intuit Inc.

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 1302
  • 102 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1410
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7094
  • 2012 WL 1150216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a determination of indefiniteness is “a matter of claim construction”
  • explaining that group one cases involve “a total omis- sion of structure” from the specification
  • “This court imposed the algorithm requirement to prevent purely functional claiming when a patentee employs a special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitation.”
  • “This type of purely functional language, which simply restates the function associated with the means-plus-function limitation, is insufficient to provide the required corresponding structure.”
  • “This court imposed the algo- rithm requirement to prevent purely functional claiming when a patentee employs a special purpose computer- implemented means-plus-function limitation.”
  • “Whether a claim complies with the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is a matter of claim construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, O'Malley, Reyna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.