Intel Corporation v. Via Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation, via Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extrinsic evidence may never be used to alter meaning that is clear from intrinsic evi- dence
• holding that the internal circuitry of an electronic device need not be disclosed in the specification if one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to build and modify the device
• holding that the internal circuitry of an electronic device need not be disclosed in the specification if one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to build and modify the device
• holding that generic “core logic” was adequate corresponding structure for a claimed function although there was no specific circuitry disclosed to show how the “core logic” was modified
• holding that the internal circuitry of an electronic device need not be disclosed in the specification if one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to build and modify the device
• holding that the internal circuitry of an electronic device need not be disclosed in the specification if one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to build and modify the device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).