Skip to main content
· 9/17/1999

Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game Technology

Citations

  • 184 F.3d 1339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To prove literal infringement, the patentee must show that the accused device con tains every limitation in the asserted claims. If even one limitation is missing or not met as claimed, there is no literal infringement.”
  • “In a means-plus-function claim in which the disclosed structure is a computer, or microprocessor programmed to carry out an algorithm, the disclosed structure is not the general purpose computer, but rather the special purpose computer programmed to perform the disclosed algorithm”
  • courts must consider “objective evidence presented by the patentee ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Rader, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.