· 9/17/1999
Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game Technology
Citations
- 184 F.3d 1339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To prove literal infringement, the patentee must show that the accused device con tains every limitation in the asserted claims. If even one limitation is missing or not met as claimed, there is no literal infringement.”
- “In a means-plus-function claim in which the disclosed structure is a computer, or microprocessor programmed to carry out an algorithm, the disclosed structure is not the general purpose computer, but rather the special purpose computer programmed to perform the disclosed algorithm”
- courts must consider “objective evidence presented by the patentee ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rich, Rader, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.