Am General, LLC v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding agency committed error where its evaluation of past performance was contrary to solicitation criteria, though ultimately finding no prejudice
• “Those records determined to be recent, somewhat relevant, relevant, or very relevant will be assessed for quality.”
• applying negative implication cannon to interpret solicitation in bid protest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).