Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 581 S.E.2d 528
  • 276 Ga. 639
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1708
  • 2003 Ga. LEXIS 544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to rule on Confrontation Clause violation where record was unclear, and ordering new trial on other grounds
  • noting that “[c]ourts of last resort must frequently construe the language of a statute, but such courts may not substitute by judicial interpretation language of their own for the clear, unambiguous language of the statute, so as to change the meaning” (punctuation omitted)
  • considering a victim’s “relationship with an ex-boyfriend and whether the desire to reestablish that relationship was a motive to make a false claim of rape” against the defendant
  • “Evidence merely that the victim has or had a romantic relationship with another man does not reflect on her character for sexual behavior.”
  • evidence that the victim merely has or had a romantic relationship with another man does not reflect on her character for sexual behavior
  • where proffered evidence went to victim's motive to lie to protect non-sexual relationship with her boyfriend, without reference to a sexual relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Benham, Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.