Skip to main content

Dawson v. State

Citations

  • 658 S.E.2d 755
  • 283 Ga. 315
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 886
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s exclusion of proffered evidence implicating a third party because it did nothing more than “raise a conjectural inference that another person committed the [crime]”
  • affirming trial court’s ruling that security video was admissible, despite the lack of personal authentication, where security director testified the cameras operated properly, were capable of reliably recording the scene, and recorded the events contemporaneously
  • “[I]t is improper to allow a witness to testify as to the identity of a person in a video or photograph when such opinion evidence tends only to establish a fact which average jurors could decide thinking for themselves and drawing their own conclusions.” (citation and punctuation omitted
  • presentation of testimony to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.