Nicely v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that drug possession and traffic offenses arose from the same conduct because the defendant was charged with driving while his license was suspended and, at the same time, having drugs in his car and on his person
• reversing denial of double jeopardy plea in bar as to two crimes arising from the same conduct
• reversing denial of double jeopardy plea in bar as to two crimes arising from the same conduct
• providing that “[u]nder OCGA § 16-1-7 (b
• reversing denial of plea in bar when district attorney’s actual knowledge concerning charge of cocaine possession was imputed to assistant district attorney who had previously accepted a plea as to a traffic citation arising from the same conduct
• defendant must show that “prosecuting attorney for the State who handled the first prosecution had actual knowledge of the facts supporting the charge allegedly subject to a plea in bar”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).