Skip to main content

Hamilton v. State

Citations

  • 555 S.E.2d 701
  • 274 Ga. 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that counsel's strategic decision to advise the appellant not to testify was reasonable because the State would cross-examine him about his prior similar crimes
  • holding that even where an objection is raised, no reversible error is created by the trial court’s failure to give an unrequested curative instruction or other remedial relief
  • concluding that counsel’s strategic decision to advise the appellant not 15 to testify was reasonable because the State would cross-examine him about his prior similar crimes
  • concluding trial counsel did not perform deficiently in urging defendant not to testify in part because “they expected the prosecuting attorney to make very effective cross-examination”
  • reiterating that “a reviewing court must be highly deferential to [strategic or tactical] choices made by defense counsel in the conduct of a trial that are arguably dictated by a reasonable trial strategy”
  • reiterating that “a reviewing court must be highly deferential to [strategic or tactical] choices made by defense counsel in the conduct of a trial that are arguably dictated by a reasonable trial strategy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.