Howard v. McLucas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-minority employees had the right to intervene to challenge the promotional remedy, but not to contest the existence of past discrimination
• holding the intervenors would be “limited to challenging the portion of the remedy” with which they had a right to intervene under Rule 24(a)
• finding denial of intervention to be an abuse of discretion in part because \intervenor-appellants raise an important question regarding the legality of the race-conscious promotional remedy\
• allowing intervention where proposed consent order would promote 240 class members to “target” positions and make white employees ineligible for those promotions
• finding denial of intervention to be an abuse of discretion in part because “intervenor-appellants raise an important question regarding the legality of the race-conscious promotional remedy”
• recommending the district court “limit discovery narrowly to the single issue which intervenors are permitted to address and set and enforce strict time limits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Edwards v. City of Houston
  Fifth Circuit· 1996-04-01· cited 247×
• Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-02-16· cited 217×
• Mountain Top Condominium Association v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1995-12-18· cited 172×
• Harris v. Pernsley
  Third Circuit· 1987-05-15· cited 171×
• United States of America, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago, William C. Bigby, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-04-24· cited 86×
• State of Texas v. USA
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-11-09· cited 80×
• Meek v. Metropolitan Dade County
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-02-26· cited 56×
• Black Fire Fighters Ass'n of Dallas v. City of Dallas, Tex.
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-04-18· cited 54×
• Bell v. American Title Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-01-25· cited 39×
• James Reeves v. James B. Harrell, Intervenors-Appellees v. Ray Wilkes
  Eleventh Circuit· 1986-06-23· cited 28×
• United States v. State Of Oregon
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-27· cited 24×
• Johnson v. Mortham
  N.D. Florida· 1995-11-20· cited 22×
• Reynolds v. Roberts
  M.D. Alabama· 1994-02-09· cited 22×
• State ex rel. Napolitano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-04-13· cited 14×
• United States v. New York City Board of Education
  E.D. New York· 2000-02-09· cited 11×
• Forest Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-25· cited 11×
• Laube v. Campbell
  M.D. Alabama· 2003-03-27· cited 8×
• United States v. South Florida Water Management District
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-28· cited 7×
• Klaas v. Donovan (In Re Donovan)
  S.D. Florida· 2009-03-03· cited 5×
• United States v. City of Hialeah
  S.D. Florida· 1994-08-16· cited 4×

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
• Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 1,665×
• Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 1,370×
• East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,222×
• United Steelworkers of America v. Weber
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 812×
• Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 507×
• 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-Appellants
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-08-29· cited 332×
• United States v. Jefferson County
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 297×
• 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-06-09· cited 231×
• Vanguards of Cleveland v. City of Cleveland, and Local Number 93, I.A.F.F., Afl-Cio, Intervenor-Appellant
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-04-22· cited 67×
• Preston v. Heckler
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-06-07· cited 63×
• Hijar v. Burrus
  Supreme Court· 1985-10-07· cited 62×
• West Virginia Association of Community Health Centers, Inc. v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, Health & Human Services
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-05-18· cited 50×
• In Re Fine Paper Antitrust Litigation, Kimberly-Clark Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1980-02-21· cited 45×
• 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1186, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,220 William C. Turner v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air Force
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-04-18· cited 37×
• Kirkland v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-08· cited 31×
• Athens Lumber Company, Incorporated v. Federal Election Commission
  Federal Circuit· 1982-11-08· cited 28×
• Doherty v. Rutgers School of Law-Newark
  Third Circuit· 1981-06-16· cited 27×
• James Reeves, James A. Harrell, James B. Dean, Jr., and Others, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. Ray Wilkes
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-03-08· cited 24×
• Howard v. McLucas
  M.D. Georgia· 1984-11-19· cited 5×