17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court abused its discretion in finding a motion to intervene untimely where an existing party had previously prevented notice to affected parties
• holding that if, on remand, it was shown that employees had contractual relationship that covered seniority rights, interest requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) would be satisfied
• holding that a district court abused its discretion in finding a motion to intervene untimely where an existing party had previously prevented notice to affected parties
• explaining that the “size and sophistication of the would-be intervenor” — in that case, the NAACP — was a relevant factor in determining timeliness
• explaining that the “size and sophistication of the would-be intervenor”—in that case, the NAACP— was a relevant factor in determining timeliness
• holding that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).