N.D. Florida· 11/20/1995
Johnson v. Mortham
Citations
- 915 F. Supp. 1529
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17993
- 1995 WL 707856
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Registered voters have . . . a sufficiently substantial interest to intervene[] in an action challenging the voting district in which the voters are registered.”
- evidence of bizarre configuration by itself was sufficient to establish racial gerrymander
- registered voters have standing to intervene, challenge voting district in which registered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Udge, Hatchett, Paul, Vinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. City of BoerneFifth Circuit· 2011-09-28· cited 57×
- People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-12-01· cited 42×
- Johnson v. MorthamN.D. Florida· 1996-06-06· cited 25×
- Hill v. ButterworthN.D. Florida· 1996-08-07· cited 20×
- In re BelowSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-06-22· cited 18×
- Dillard v. City of GreensboroEleventh Circuit· 1996-01-03· cited 13×
- Johnson v. MorthamN.D. Florida· 1996-10-29· cited 13×
- King v. State Board of ElectionsN.D. Illinois· 1996-03-15· cited 7×
- Corman v. TorresM.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-03-19· cited 7×
- Johnson v. MorthamN.D. Florida· 1996-02-07· cited 4×
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-06-29· cited 3×
- Leag of Untd Latin Amer Ctzn v. City of Boerne, EtFifth Circuit· 2011-09-28
- Dillard v. City Of GreensboroEleventh Circuit· 1996-01-24
- Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, Inc. v. Secretary, Florida Department of StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2025-07-17
Cites
93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 1981-11-03· cited 11,375×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 5,442×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court· 1972-03-20· cited 2,756×
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 2,178×
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 1,347×
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 1,325×
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,301×
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,221×
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1932-05-02· cited 1,171×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.